|
Eyes of patients who have used PureVision for
between one and two years on a continuous wear basis |
It is now more than two years since I started fitting silicone
hydrogel contact lenses, primarily for extended wear. Having fitted
about 300 patients and been involved in a number of Bausch and
Lomb Purevision workshops in Australia and New Zealand, I have
compiled answers to the most commonly asked questions and misconceptions.
Why are the new silicone hydrogels safer than previous attempts
at extended wear contact lenses? Previous attempts at extended
wear contact lenses did not deliver sufficient oxygen transmission
to prevent hypoxia. Equally important is the fact that when properly
fitted the new silicone hydrogels do not adhere to the cornea
and so allow adequate tear exchange to prevent build-up of toxins.
The non-porous nature of the new silicone hydrogel lenses also
minimises deposit build-up.
What type of patient is most suited to extended wear?
Successful daily wear patients who are looking for the ultimate
in convenience. The most common reasons for failure are either
fitting or tear quality related. Silicone hydrogels have also
been useful for daily wear patients with high oxygen requirements,
deposit problems or dryness problems with conventional soft lenses.
What is the most common wear regime recommended?
About half the patients I have fitted wear the lenses for 30 days
continuously. The other half remove their lenses weekly or bi-weekly
for a rub and rinse with a multi-purpose solution to minimise
the build-up of toxins between the lens and the cornea. The frequency
of removal is based on the quantity of mucin and lipid build-up
between the lens and cornea.
What are the most common complications experienced with silicone
hydrogel extended wear? I have observed sterile peripheral
corneal ulcers in three per cent of patients, acute red eye in
two per cent of patients and superior epithelial arcuate corneal
lesions in one per cent of patients. The success rate of patients
who make it through the first month trial is in excess of 90 per
cent. All patients who experienced corneal ulcers and acute red
eye were able to return to extended contact lens wear after a
few days rest and with more frequent removal of the lenses for
a rub and rinseusing a multi-purpose solution. I have not yet
observed a microbial keratitis with silicone hydrogel extended
wear.
Is comfort a problem with silicone hydrogels? Some patients
who have previously worn thin medium to high water disposable
contact lenses report initial discomfort with silicone hydrogels.
This initial discomfort, which is probably caused by the relatively
greater rigidity of the material, improves with adaptation, as
does the tolerance of extended wear.
Does the surface quality of silicone hydrogels deteriorate
with handling or wear? Silicone hydrogels gradually lose their
wettability during a month of wear. There is no significant difference
in the rate of deterioration between daily wear and extended wear.
Protein deposits are not common on this type of material. Lipids
and mucous deposits start to adhere to the surface only when it
has deteriorated. The lens performance deteriorates rapidly after
a month of wear.
Is lens performance affected by the environment? Silicone
hydrogels out-perform conventional soft lens material in most
environments. I have fitted a patient who successfully wore silicone
hydrogels throughout a mountain climbing expedition in the Himalayas.
The lenses also perform very well for scuba diving and in aeroplanes.
How important are lens lubricants in silicone hydrogel extended
wear? Lens lubricants are commonly used on awakening to rewet
the lenses and flush out any overnight muco-lipid build-up. Although
I recommend lens lubricants to all my extended wear patients,
some patients claim they make little or no difference to their
comfort or tolerance of extended wear.
Is it safe to swim in silicone hydrogel extended wear contact
lenses? Silicone hydrogel lenses are particularly suitable
for swimming in the surf. Due to their rigidity, they do not dislodge
as easily as conventional soft lenses. The risk of contamination
is very low in the sea. On the contrary, I recommend goggles for
swimming in pools due to the higher risk of contamination. Patients
are warned to be very careful in spa baths where the risk of contamination
is even higher.
*This article was originally published in the 2000-2001 edition
of the Contact Lens supplement of the Australian Optometry magazine,
and is presented here with their kind permission.
|