This web site is no longer actively maintained. Please visit http://www.contactlensupdate.com for up to date information.
Search
Powered by Google
Home
This Month
Editorial
Ocular Surface Characteristics of the Asian Eye
>
more
Meeting Synopsis
Academy 2010
>
more
Posters
pective Analysis of Risk Factors Associated With Contact Lens Induced Inflammatory Events During Continuous Wear
>
more
Feature Review
Adequate tear mixing under a soft contact lens may play an important role in minimizing certain > more
Tell a friend
> Home
> About Us
> Affiliates
> Contact Us
> Disclaimer
> Site Map

 




The Silicone Hydrogels website is partially supported through an educational grant from CIBA VISION

 
Posters | Archive
June 2007

 

Oxygen Permeability of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials

Philip B. Morgan [1], Nathan Efron [2], Ian D. Cameron [1], Marie Goodwin [1], Noel A. Brennan [3]

[1] Eurolens Research, University of Manchester, UK; [2] Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; [3] Brennan Consultants, Melbourne, Australia

 

Purpose:
To measure the oxygen permeability (Dk) of currently- available silicone hydrogel contact lens materials.

Methods:
Permeability was measured in a randomized and masked manner for the following silicone hydrogel contact lens materials: Acuvue Advance, Acuvue Oasys, Focus Night & Day, O2 Optix and PureVision.  Two conventional hydrogel lens materials, Etafilcon A and pHEMA, were measured as controls. We used an extended version of the polarographic measurement method described in ISO 9913-1. Stacks of 1-6 -1.00DS contact lenses were evaluated, with each stack measured twice. The resulting value for t/Dk (derived from electrode current and mathematically correcting for the edge effect) was plotted against t for each stack, with Dk calculated as the inverse of the gradient of this relationship; this latter method corrects for the boundary effect.

Results:
Measured permeability values (+/- 95% CI), and manufacturer- claimed values in parentheses, were: Acuvue Advance 75.2 +/- 9.8 (60), Acuvue Oasys 107.4 +/- 7.4 (103), Focus Night & Day 162.0 +/- 9.8 (140), O2 Optix 80.5 +/- 4.9 (110), PureVision 75.9 +/- 6.6 (99), Etafilcon 21.0 +/- 1.0 (21) and pHEMA 8.2 +/- 0.7 (7.5).

Conclusions:
Our values were broadly similar to manufacturer-claimed values for the two reference materials and the Acuvue Oasys lens. It is unclear whether some manufacturers have accounted for edge and/or boundary effects, and some manufacturers may have used a different measurement methodology (coulometric); these factors may account for discrepancies between our data and that of manufacturers. Our extended ISO methodology has generated data points with small 95% confidence intervals, suggesting that the use of the polarographic method of oxygen permeability measurement can be successfully employed with hyper-permeable contact lens materials.

Download PDF of Poster:
Download - 396 KB
You will need Version 4 or later of Adobe Acrobat Reader to view some documents on this site. You can get the latest version from the Adobe Home site. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
All rights reserved, copyright 2002 - 2007 siliconehydrogels.org